Elitserien M Standings
# | Team | P | Pl | W | D | L | GF:GA | GD |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Kristianstad IFK | 60 | 32 | 30 | 0 | 2 | 959:764 | +195 |
2 | Alingsas HK | 44 | 32 | 21 | 2 | 9 | 862:762 | +100 |
3 | Lugi HK | 42 | 32 | 20 | 2 | 10 | 857:796 | +61 |
4 | Ystads IF | 41 | 32 | 18 | 5 | 9 | 912:829 | +83 |
5 | Malmö HK IFK | 41 | 32 | 19 | 3 | 10 | 827:765 | +62 |
6 | Sävehof IK | 39 | 32 | 18 | 3 | 11 | 865:819 | +46 |
6 | Karlskrona IFK | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0:0 | 0 |
7 | Redbergslids IK | 39 | 32 | 18 | 3 | 11 | 843:802 | +41 |
8 | Guif IF | 36 | 32 | 16 | 4 | 12 | 850:806 | +44 |
9 | Hammarby IF | 33 | 32 | 14 | 5 | 13 | 839:833 | +6 |
10 | Ricoh HK | 21 | 32 | 9 | 3 | 20 | 751:794 | -43 |
11 | Skövde HK IFK | 17 | 32 | 8 | 1 | 23 | 740:849 | -109 |
12 | Hästö IF | 16 | 32 | 7 | 2 | 23 | 788:884 | -96 |
13 | Aranäs HK | 13 | 32 | 6 | 1 | 25 | 789:956 | -167 |
14 | Drott HK | 6 | 32 | 2 | 2 | 28 | 779:1002 | -223 |
# | Team | P | Pl | W | D | L | GF:GA | GD |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Kristianstad IFK | 32 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 503:366 | +137 |
2 | Alingsas HK | 26 | 16 | 13 | 0 | 3 | 458:365 | +93 |
3 | Malmö HK IFK | 24 | 16 | 12 | 0 | 4 | 428:361 | +67 |
4 | Ystads IF | 20 | 16 | 9 | 2 | 5 | 482:430 | +52 |
5 | Guif IF | 20 | 16 | 9 | 2 | 5 | 449:401 | +48 |
6 | Sävehof IK | 20 | 16 | 9 | 2 | 5 | 431:390 | +41 |
7 | Lugi HK | 20 | 16 | 9 | 2 | 5 | 415:404 | +11 |
8 | Hammarby IF | 18 | 16 | 7 | 4 | 5 | 436:414 | +22 |
9 | Redbergslids IK | 18 | 16 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 423:403 | +20 |
10 | Hästö IF | 14 | 16 | 6 | 2 | 8 | 418:423 | -5 |
11 | Ricoh HK | 12 | 16 | 6 | 0 | 10 | 381:376 | +5 |
12 | Skövde HK IFK | 10 | 16 | 5 | 0 | 11 | 374:414 | -40 |
13 | Aranäs HK | 9 | 16 | 4 | 1 | 11 | 411:455 | -44 |
14 | Drott HK | 5 | 16 | 2 | 1 | 13 | 382:468 | -86 |
15 | Karlskrona IFK | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0:0 | 0 |
# | Team | P | Pl | W | D | L | GF:GA | GD |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Kristianstad IFK | 28 | 16 | 14 | 0 | 2 | 456:398 | +58 |
2 | Lugi HK | 22 | 16 | 11 | 0 | 5 | 442:392 | +50 |
3 | Ystads IF | 21 | 16 | 9 | 3 | 4 | 430:399 | +31 |
4 | Redbergslids IK | 21 | 16 | 10 | 1 | 5 | 420:399 | +21 |
5 | Sävehof IK | 19 | 16 | 9 | 1 | 6 | 434:429 | +5 |
6 | Alingsas HK | 18 | 16 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 404:397 | +7 |
7 | Malmö HK IFK | 17 | 16 | 7 | 3 | 6 | 399:404 | -5 |
8 | Guif IF | 16 | 16 | 7 | 2 | 7 | 401:405 | -4 |
9 | Hammarby IF | 15 | 16 | 7 | 1 | 8 | 403:419 | -16 |
10 | Ricoh HK | 9 | 16 | 3 | 3 | 10 | 370:418 | -48 |
11 | Skövde HK IFK | 7 | 16 | 3 | 1 | 12 | 366:435 | -69 |
12 | Aranäs HK | 4 | 16 | 2 | 0 | 14 | 378:501 | -123 |
13 | Hästö IF | 2 | 16 | 1 | 0 | 15 | 370:461 | -91 |
14 | Drott HK | 1 | 16 | 0 | 1 | 15 | 397:534 | -137 |
15 | Karlskrona IFK | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0:0 | 0 |
- P
- Points
- Pl
- Played
- W
- Wins
- D
- Draws
- L
- Losses
- GF:GA
- Goals For:Goals Againts
- GD
- Goal difference
Alingsas HK - Guif IF Statistics
Compare the performance of Alingsas HK and Guif IF in the az Elitserien M 2015/2016 season. Here you will find their head-to-head matches as well.
Based on statistical data, you can form your own prediction for this match. Examine which team has scored or conceded more goals and assess the current form of both teams.
By placing performance graphs side by side, you can track the progress of Alingsas HK and Guif IF in the championship.
Team Forms
When calculating team form, the last 5 matches are taken into account. This contributes to the overall form. For home and away form, the team's last 5 home and away matches are considered.
The form difference comes into play when comparing two teams.
The form difference involves two numbers: (home team's home form - away team's away form) and the difference between the total forms of the two teams. This can provide some indication of the likely outcome of the next match between the two teams.
If both numbers are positive and greater than 5, the home team is more likely to win. If both numbers are negative and less than -5, the away team is more likely to win. Otherwise, it might be a draw, but it's not recommended to base predictions solely on these numbers.